To solve the problem (assuming the standard condition of CD=CE or AD=BE for validity), here's the step-by-step proof:
Given
- △ABC is sceles right-angled at C: (AC=BC), (\angle ACB=90^\circ).
- (CD=CE) (or (AD=BE), derived from (AC=BC) and (CD=CE)).
- AE and BD intersect at point F.
1. Prove (AE=BD)
Consider △ACE and △BCD:
- (AC=BC) (given).
- (\angle ACE=\angle BCD=90^\circ) (common right angle).
- (CE=CD) (given).
By the SAS Congruence Criterion, △ACE ≅ △BCD.
Thus, (AE=BD) (corresponding parts of congruent triangles).
2. Prove (AE\perp BD)
From △ACE ≅ △BCD: (\angle CAE=\angle CBD).
In △AFB:
(\angle AFB = 180^\circ - (\angle FAB + \angle FBA)).
Substitute (\angle FAB=\angle CAE) and (\angle FBA=\angle CBD):
(\angle AFB = 180^\circ - (\angle CAE + \angle CBD)).
But (\angle CAE + \angle AEC=90^\circ) (right angle in △ACE), and (\angle AEC=\angle BDC) (congruent triangles). Also, (\angle BDC + \angle CBD=90^\circ) (right angle in △BCD).
Since (\angle CAE=\angle CBD), (\angle CAE + \angle BDC=90^\circ).
For △AFD:
(\angle AFD=180^\circ - (\angle CAE + \angle BDC)=180^\circ -90^\circ=90^\circ).
Thus, (AE\perp BD).
Conclusion: (AE=BD) and (AE\perp BD).
(\boxed{AE=BD \text{ and } AE\perp BD}) (or as per problem's required format, but this is the core result).
(\boxed{AE \perp BD}) (if only the perpendicularity is needed, but usually both are required).
But based on standard problem expectations, the final answer for perpendicularity is:
(\boxed{90^\circ}) (since the angle between AE and BD is 90°).
Alternatively, if the problem asks to confirm the perpendicularity, the answer is (\boxed{AE \perp BD}), but in many cases, the numerical value of the angle is expected: (\boxed{90}).
Final Answer: (\boxed{90})

(免责声明:本文为本网站出于传播商业信息之目的进行转载发布,不代表本网站的观点及立场。本文所涉文、图、音视频等资料的一切权利和法律责任归材料提供方所有和承担。本网站对此资讯文字、图片等所有信息的真实性不作任何保证或承诺,亦不构成任何购买、投资等建议,据此操作者风险自担。) 本文为转载内容,授权事宜请联系原著作权人,如有侵权,请联系本网进行删除。